Tuesday, June 20, 2017

it doesn't matter if teams tank for the draft

There’s a lot of chatter about teams throwing their season for the draft and how this is an issue requiring resolution from the league office.  As in, the office that typically does a great job of solving problems in a mature, professional, and honest manner.
 
I don’t see why this is a problem though.  So teams are tanking for the draft?  Okay.  So what?  The NFL is not the NBA.  A team with 5 is not a team with 22 starters.
 
The Browns likely tanked and got Myles Garrett.  Okay, good for them.  He might be awesome.  He might not be.  Who knows.  But is anybody going to argue that now the Browns can become a dominant team?  Does anybody want to wager say, ten grand, on if the Browns will have a season above 500 in the next decade?  I wouldn’t take that bet.
 
Last year’s number one pick was Jared Goff, aka that guy who doesn’t know what direction the sun rises and sets each day.  Anybody want to take that 500 in a decade bet on the Rams?
 
Maybe Jameis Winston has it in him to be a true franchise quarterback?  We shall see.  Anybody see the Bucs as a true Super Bowl contender?  I don’t.
 
Jadeveon Clowney seems to finally be taking off, living up to his beast potential.  We shall see.  Anybody see the Tejans as a true Super Bowl contender?  I don’t.
 
Nobody can seem to determine if Eric Fisher is the best or the worst.  Or both at the same time.  Not even Eric Fisher.
 
And of course, the big daddy of all tanks, the Suck for Luck campaign yielded one of the best quarterback talents in a decade to the dumpster fire that is the Indianapolis Colts.  And they’ve promptly destroyed that man’s body.  Luck will need a motorized cart to get from his imperial sized bed to his gold plated bathroom by the time he’s 36.
 
Let teams tank, whatever.  The draft has been proven to be the ultimate game of roulette.  Either you hit or you don’t.  It’s why smart teams stockpile as many picks as possible, led by smart personnel staffs that know how to build a roster.  As in, the teams that are professionally run well enough to not need to tank.  These are the teams that will consistently make the playoffs and win.
 
So it doesn’t matter if teams tank for the draft.  Just let it all continue to play out.  The game will go on.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

what are the Chiefs and Jets thinking?

Let's face it, there's not enough talent in the NFL.  It's why folks have talked for years about a developmental league.  You've got your superstars at each position, but after them there's a whole bunch of dudes you couldn't tell apart from your neighbor.

And yet, for whatever reason, the Chiefs and Jets have decided they can do without Jeremy Maclin and Eric Decker, two decent receivers.  Neither of these dudes are superstars, but they can produce.  They can get shit done.

Who precisely do the Chiefs and Jets think they have on hand to replace this talent?  Apparently your neighbor.  And in other unrelated news, both these teams can't win.

And also, I think the folks who are saying the current CBA screws veterans are probably right.  Teams are going to take some random dude over even an above average veteran in many cases, because paying your neighbor is a lot cheaper.